Well, there is no doubt that Jack Layton scored big time, in this election. After all, he is now the Leader of the Opposition with just over 100 elected members. ( And already there are signs of foot & mouth from his members. )
So what did he do differently this time around?
Well for starters, he actually acted like he wanted to be Prime Minister. Hell he even said it, and proceeded to campaign like he actually was gunning for the top job. That alone was a huge difference in the NDP than ever before. It was kind of, well infectious too, as one liked the notion, that he could dream that high. Now he is close to that actuality.
Yet is this a one shot wonder?
The thing is, there were other factors, that I think added to his sudden surge. One of the major reasons I think is, that Jack Layton stood up to Stephen Harper & his bullying. That gave him an aura, a sense of actually that he might be one who could lead, who could stand up for Canadians.
Now that perception is an elusive one to grab hold of. Yet Jack Layton seemed to exude that, this time around. Now I saw him at a rally, and it was early in the election, but he wasn’t the same Jack Layton that he is now. He changed during the course of the election.
He grew some Kahunas ( balls for those who don’t know )
The other factor, I think that put him into second place, so solidly, was the Liberal Campaign strategy. Michael Ignatieff didn’t go after Harper, nor did he respond to the Attack ads, while Jack did.
Granted there weren’t a large number of attack ads aimed at the NDP, until the last week, but when they came, Jack responded. He put them where it belonged, on the sidelines. He turned the so called ‘leaked massage’ attack where it belonged, in the trash. He made it into an advantage for him, while at the same time, standing up to the bully himself.
Ignatieff didn’t do that, hence his 30 seats only.
Jack did, hence his 100+ seats.
Jack also created the perception that he actually would fight for me. Something the others couldn’t, or wouldn’t do. His campaign struck a chord with many, who are tired of the Harper plan to support only the rich, and only for big business. It was enough to get him second place.
The other aspect, or perception, as I saw it, was he adapted during the campaign. That say a lot about a possible leader. It means he’s prepared to switch course, when something isn’t working. Something that Harper doesn’t do easily. This perception gives a clear difference between the two.
One problem, I think was the perception that he was not a good manager for the Economy. That may actually have been the defining perception, that prevented the NDP from gaining more seats. It is the one perception that has haunted the NDP for decades. Jack didn’t do much to dispel that perception either.
So I guess my question is, can he move to the next level? Can he show more Economic sense than a died in the wool Ultra Right Wing Conservative?



